Investigation Protocol — Report 7/***3
The connection between Chapa and the Stellar Embassy (often referred to as the Embassy or the Galactic Embassy in various testimonies) was never formal, official, or even publicly acknowledged during the years in question. Yet the structure of relations that emerges from the testimonies — diaries, reconstructions, later lectures, and cross-references with the Nadgorarian narrative — reveals a consistent and unmistakable pattern.
1. Purpose of the Investigation
The investigation was commissioned to:
1. Examine whether a direct or indirect relationship existed between Chapa and the Stellar Embassy (hereafter: SE).
2. Assess whether Chapa’s activities during 1987–1989 were influenced, coordinated, or intended to complement SE operations in the Visible World.
3. Determine whether SE functioned as a legal successor to Planet N and how this affected Chapa’s role and the “Constant Knowing” (Yodea Kavu’a) framework.
2. Committee Composition
Chair: A.S., Coordination Division 2
Members:
D.R., Field Documentation Unit
M.Ya., Systems Integration Office
H.G., Historical Oversight Department
Observers:
Representative of the “New Entities”
Representative of Groups 5–6
Secretary: T.A., Archives & Recordkeeping

3. Background
3.1 Re-emergence of the Stellar Embassy
Following the disappearance of Planet N (February 1988), a power vacuum existed. The SE appeared without prior notification, asserting itself as the legal successor of Planet N.
SE claimed:
Responsibility for integrating “Group B” (the Insight forces) into the Visible World.
Veto authority over any non-visible entity operating in Zones 1 and 2.
Oversight of transitions, disconnections, and restorations in the system.
3.2 Chapa’s Timeline
Period Chapa’s Activity Stellar Embassy Activity
June 1987 Last known visit in Israel; leaves shortly after Shavuot —
July–Dec 1987 Physical absence, but indirect influence reported —
Dec 1987–Feb 1988 Transmission interference; Planet N collapses —
Mar–Apr 1988 Chapa returns to Israel; begins intensive operations SE reappears; declares authority
Apr–Dec 1988 Operates multiple groups; “Constant Knowing” framework SE integrates Group B into the Visible World under conditions
Observation: The timing of SE’s re-emergence aligns closely with Chapa’s return.
4. Findings
4.1 Direct Employment
No evidence found that Chapa was formally employed, contracted, or deputized by SE.
4.2 Recognition by SE
Early SE internal protocols reference “experienced local instructors”; analysis suggests Chapa is included.
SE maintained a policy of anonymity for human field operatives.
4.3 Alignment of Actions
Chapa implemented small, parallel groups, avoided mention of space or Planet N, and stabilized human readiness for Constant Knowing.
4 of 5 SE operational guidelines are met by Chapa’s actions.
Only exception: Chapa did not follow SE-formalized procedural formats.
4.4 Reliance on Chapa
SE archives (May 1988) note:
> “Local senior operative is active. No further intervention needed.”
This confirms SE’s functional reliance on Chapa without formal acknowledgment.
5. Conclusions
1. Chapa was not an official agent of the Stellar Embassy.
2. Temporal, conceptual, and functional alignment between Chapa’s activities and SE guidelines is clear.
3. SE recognized Chapa as a regional authority without publicly naming him.
4. Chapa’s 1988–1989 operations were critical to SE’s stabilization and integration plans in the Visible World.
5. SE relied on Chapa’s independent action, preserving human autonomy and operational cover.
> Summary Statement:
“Chapa is not an SE agent, but without him, SE could not have established itself effectively in the Visible World in 1988.”
6. Recommendations
Document informal field operatives without compromising identity.
Avoid over-reliance on off-system transmission channels.
Archive indirect operational influence reports.
Recognize Constant Knowing framework as a validated operational method.-
7. Signatories
Chair: A.S., Coordination Division 2
Members:
D.R., Field Documentation Unit
M.Ya., Systems Integration Office
H.G., Historical Oversight Department
Observers:
Representative of the “New Entities”
Representative of Groups 5–6
Secretary: T.A., Archives & Recordkeeping
Censored Release Date: ** Tevet ***3 (December ***3)

